Skip to main content
Search
Menu
-

FIRE21 - Research 2022 - Norway

FIRE21 is a four-year-long project that investigates problem-solving in the Fire and Rescue services in the 21st century. Work package 2 is researching network-based problem-solving in the Fire and Rescue services.

The Norwegian research in 2022

In 2022 the Norwegian research group in FIRE21 has mostly been occupied with data gathering for work package 2- Benchmarking Network-Based Problem-Solving in the Fire and Rescue Services (FRS). Two out of three case studies have been conducted, and the data material consists of about 20 qualitative interviews.

Case study 1 – a small rural FRS

The first case study was carried out in a small rural Fire and Rescue Service (FRS) in the mountains of Norway. This FRS serves a large geographic area with few inhabitants. Except for the fire chief, there are only part-time firefighters. Although there are few professional or “full-time” emergency actors, there are many informal actors in the local community to rely on to maintain a local emergency response.

Case study 2 – a large, specialized FRS 

Our other case was a large FRS serving both a large city and several smaller surrounding municipalities. This FRS is of interest because of the specialization and centralization required by this organization. In 2021, there was a large fire in a parking house connected to the local airport. Studying this incident has given insight into how the organization mobilizes problem-solving networks during a fire.

Interesting themes have been identified

Several interesting themes emerged during the data collection. Here are three of the themes we want to look at in more detail.

Theme 1 – qualities of rural FRSs

  • How is it possible to have adequate preparedness in a large area with limited resources when it comes to personnel, limited water supply, and physical equipment?
  • What are the primary qualities?
  • What is today´s role of the part-time firefighter in rural Norway?

Theme 2 – Common operational picture (COP)

  • The position (formal/informal) of COP in FRSs in Norway and Sweden.
  • What activities involved in an incident are a part of the COP?
  • Can COP be defined as a process or a product, or both? Or is it something completely different?
  • Come closer to a definition of COP in a Norwegian context and find a “best practice” of the operationalization of the concept.

Theme 3 – The need for both stability and flexibility in FRS.

  • What is the relation between these two qualities?
  • How do these qualities materialize (different) in rural and urban FRSs?
  • How is it possible to facilitate both flexibility and stability?

Next step in the research – a third case study

In 2023, the third and last Norwegian case study will be conducted. It will probably involve an FRS that recently handled a landslide incident.

The analysis will give a common understanding

The data material from the three cases will be carefully analyzed. Through thorough collaboration with Sweden and Denmark to develop a common understanding of our data in a Nordic context. The result will then be presented in various scientific articles.
 

FIRE21 start page

Contact person

Tove Mallin

Enhetschef

Read more about Tove

Contact Tove
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

* Mandatory By submitting the form, RISE will process your personal data.

Contact person

Kerstin Eriksson

Forskare

+46 10 516 52 46

Read more about Kerstin

Contact Kerstin
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

* Mandatory By submitting the form, RISE will process your personal data.