Skip to main content
Search
Menu
Agricultural waste

Agricultural residues a new business opportunity as single-use plastics are phased out

We need to use fewer plastic products – not least when it comes to single-use items. Both for environmental reasons as well as for a new EU directive. Part of the solution is spelled agricultural waste products, which can be given new life as both functional and inexpensive disposables and packaging.

The way we use plastic needs to change. Single-use plastic can today have major consequences for animals and nature when it turns into garbage. And there is a lot of litter – about 85% of marine litter in the EU is made up of plastic.  

Agriculture can complement the forest for plastic substitutes. Therefore, the need for alternatives to plastic is great. A possible and proven replacement is wood fibre from the forest, but today the competition for the raw material that the forest provides is great, and the price is relatively high. Can there instead be residual streams that can be made of material, that grow relatively quickly and which are also a cheap raw material that would otherwise be lost?

The answer can be found in agriculture, a large industry with several different untapped residual streams, for example from crops such as sugar beet, wheat bran, oat husks and reeds. Today, some are used as animal feed, but much is burned or thrown away. In many cases, these can work at least as well as wood to make new materials from.  

"One example is cider presses, which have lots of peels that are thrown away but can be turned into vegan leather. There are also international examples where residues from corn production become barrier materials for packaging," says Juhanes Aydin, Head of Unit at RISE. 

There is no need to choose wood over materials from agriculture

Beer production can provide raw material for several different materials  

In some cases, it is a matter of using the rest as it is, but most often processing and refining are needed to produce different fractions such as fibre, carbohydrates, fats and proteins. They, in turn, become building elements for new materials that act as, for example, packaging. 

"Breweries get a lot of draff (a by-product of beer production) left over from their processes, where we look at what else can be gained from the leftovers. What you can extract in the form of fibres or proteins in turn indicates what type of material you can make," says Juhanes Aydin. 

The fact that the various side streams of agriculture contain more than just fibre, makes them versatile and attractive as raw materials in packaging.  

"The material has different character depending on what it is, there are big differences in properties and it is needed – it is not always water that the packaging should be a barrier to, it can be things like oil or oxygen. This places different demands and then it is important to have access to materials with different properties,” says Juhanes Aydin, who also mentions the aesthetic aspect as important – if a package is made of oat husks, you often want it to be visible, not least for marketing purposes. 

"I am quite sure that there will be a great demand for products made of these materials. Not least when it comes to packaging for food from grocery stores or restaurants. There is no need to choose wood over materials from agriculture,” says Juhanes Aydin. 

Much remains to be done – but the expertise is there 

Different businesses need to find their area of use and model and then use RISE's experts in different ways:  

"We test how to extract different components and get the right properties, help with prototypes, look at how this can work in an existing process, do life cycle analyses and review business models and profitability," says Juhanes Aydin.  

Sweden's focus on wood fibre has meant that there is so far no reprocessed chain to take advantage of agricultural residues in an efficient way. 

"In Germany and Holland, these residual streams are much more exploited. There, for example, manufacturers of vegan leather go around and pick up the material from different farmers and then refine it," says Juhanes Aydin.

AGRICULTURAL RESIDUES CHEAPER THAN PLASTIC WHEN IMPLEMENTING EU DIRECTIVES 

The EU's single-use plastics directive entered into force on 1 January 2022 and bans some plastic products completely, but also requires reduced consumption and better recycling. By 2030, the directive will be gradually extended, bringing more bans and further stricter requirements.  

For disposable packaging other than plastic to be attractive, it needs to cost as much, or less, than the plastic they replace.

Many residual streams from agriculture today are underused, making them cheap. Even cheaper than cellulose fibre from wood, which today still costs relatively little. The material sometimes involves a cost for farmers to dispose of. 

All in all, there are several advantages of agricultural residues in comparison with forest raw materials: price, availability, better use of an untapped side stream and a diversity of properties as they involve many different crops. In addition, dependence on wood is reduced and jobs are created. 

Juhanes Aydin

Contact person

Juhanes Aydin

Enhetschef

+46 10 516 63 87

Read more about Juhanes

Contact Juhanes
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

* Mandatory By submitting the form, RISE will process your personal data.